It is sort of hard to assess one's results. The best way is "am I happy with it?". My first marathon, last year's TM 2004 i ran a 3:43. I had no idea what to expect and was thrilled with that. Heck, finished it, didn't you? Three weeks ago I ran the Scotia Bank Waterfront Marathon [25 September]. It was my second marathon, this course was really flat, open, not bad at all. It was good conditions. Bit humid, but then you don't get too dehydrated then. I got a nasty stomach cramp around 10km. I think i took too much power gel at once. It is really important to take a bit, plus water. Maybe I should train a bit with it first and not try anything new on the day of the race. One ought to wonder about that. Anyways, around 30km, the group i was running with started to pull away - my tummy was not helping me at all. That's okay, because it was starting to go away then and I could now worry only about beginning to feel tired. I finished in 3:35 [place: 363 official time: 3:35:40.0 km pace: 5:07 chip time [my actual]: 3:34:59.9], a 8 minute PB.
Results here, go to Results Link.
So I was very happy with the
Toronto marathon just 3 weeks later where I did 3:21. A really neat view of the results are
here. Shows you graphically how you did. Type in Duke and click "marathon".
I now have to fight the aweful temptation I have to go to the Niagara Marathon website. It is 23rd October, but I think that is pushing it a little. Maybe this is adictive